Defend Our Border A View From The Froint Lines
It's Long Past Time To Get Control of Our Borders
"ALWAYS REMEMBER
 Don't believe anything you read on this web page,
 or, for that matter, anything you hear on The Neal
 Boortz Show, unless it is consistent with what you
 already know to be true, or unless you have taken
 the time to research the matter to prove its
 accuracy to your satisfaction. This is known as
 "doing your homework."" Neal Boortz
Number of Illegals Caught Today
Number Of Illegals Entering Arizona Today

Chaotic mess is predicted if U.S. mandates E-Verify Star's lame attempts to stop this good bill

Print the article

This entry was posted on 5/7/2008 3:57 AM and is filed under Defend Our Border, TheRedStar.

Chaotic mess is predicted if U.S. mandates E-Verify


Who does the Arizona Daily Star choose to quote? The pro illegal alien gang of thugs at the  Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund.
Like we can believe that gang of thugs.

The only other "expert" is the Social Security administration that is nothing more then a gang of lazy government union employees who are afraid they might have to do a little work for a change to earn their big fat government checks.

The panel's chairman, Rep. Michael McNulty, D-N.Y., said he was concerned that Social Security offices could be overwhelmed with a "massive new workload" as U.S. citizens and other authorized workers try to correct their information. This could hurt efforts by the agency to reduce an unprecedented backlog of disability claims, he said.

So we can't check employees because the system is so corrupted and SS workers are afraid they will have to put in a days work for a days pay correcting the mess they caused in the 1st place by sloppy work practices.
==================================================================================

Poster #2 tells us what the Arizona Daily Star withholds to protect their do nothing Democrat friends.

2. Comment by J. R. (Justine R) — May 7,2008 @ 12:38AM
Ratings: Thumbs Down Thumbs Up -0 +5

Giffords is fighting the e-verify requirement, will not sponsor the SAVE act, doesn't want a fence along the border to keep out drugs and smugglers, and wants amnesty for all illegals. Who elected this traitor anyway?

Now we know why the Arizona Daily Star elected that do nothing Democrat clown who supports the invader scum.

Giffords is a traitor to the United States and our children the way she supports illegal alien invaders who are bringing deadly diseases to America to kill our children.

Do you enjoy the way the Arizona Daily Star slanted this story to try and make their readers think it's a bad idea to check employees to see if they are legal.

The Arizona Daily Star supports the invaders which is why you if you love your children must stop shopping at advertisers in the Star, this will force the pro illegal alien Star to change their love illegal aliens tune.

Call or visit advertisers in the Star and let them know why you will not spend your money with them.
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————







 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
    Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

    • 5/7/2008 11:36 AM Anonymous wrote:
      Another long-time poster about to bite the dust ... snared by michaelb a.k.a. bolton


      33. Comment by Edmund W. (edmundowin) — May 7,2008 @ 9:26AM
      Ratings: -2 +10

      Oh - now I'm selfish and cowardly? Why, Michael B, that's almost slanderous, don't you think?

      But: Selfish? Because I don't want to see any more of our fine young men/women killed?

      And: Cowardly? You best back up on that one, 'friend'. You go too far.

      I've done my 'time' in war. But you obviously haven't and until you do, tossing around words like this isn't exactly putting your money where your mouth is.


      40. Comment by Michael B. (#1967)— May 7,2008 @ 10:32AM
      Ratings: -5 +1

      #35 - No dancing here. Perhaps you should read the guidelines.

      "It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks are prohibited."

      If a poster can't handle their ideas being criticized, then the poster shouldn't put those ideas in the public arena.
      ==========================================================================

      Links please

      H

      Reply to this
    • 5/7/2008 5:08 PM Anonymous wrote:
      Harry, we've been used for clicks:

      (my email to the STAR)

      Bolton, a.k.a michaelB, here's the answer to banning for some and not others:

      60. Comment by Tommy T. (notfaithblind) — May 7,2008 @ 2:19PM
      Ratings: -2 +2

      Here's a hypothetical:

      If a poster's obnoxiousness raises page views, the Star benefits from page clicks.

      Is it possible that they like list trolls to be here, so they protect them? That would make them a little cash cow. Or steer, if you will.

      It's no secret that the Star has demonstrated incompetence, with biased reporting supported by equally biased editors. Management's response to complaints is denial and arrogance.

      (We've temporarily moved away from the hypothetical here; I can document examples of biased, unethical reporting and stonewalling by management. As a former reporter and editorial writer, and a past president of a chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists, I am, unlike Star management, intimately familiar with journalism ethics.)

      Moving back into the hypothetical, it's no stretch to assume that greed and a little more ethical amorality to pad the bottom line could be at play here.

      It's a marriage made in heaven for the right wingers. They get to be the junk yard dogs they love to be, people write irate responses and the clicks just keep on coming.

      It's a win-win for the two parties, and what's another hit to a newspaper that already has a seedy reputation?




      51. Comment by Kathy D. (Saffron) — May 7,2008 @ 12:43PM
      Ratings: -3 +6

      If you will notice he doesn't direct his comment to the specific person he is being nasty with. By not mentioning any particular person Mr. Bolton doesn't think he's breaking the rules. But all of us know exactly who he is directing his comment to and know that if Mr. Bolton really looked back at previous comments, then his would be removed.
      Reply to this
    • 5/7/2008 5:38 PM Anonymous wrote:
      Harry, I think you've asked for a link. If so, here it is:

      http://regulus2.azstarnet.com/comments/index.php?id=237727

      Also, reread poster 60. Comment by Tommy T:

      His hypothetical may be correct: we're being used as "cash cows" for the "seedy Star."

      So in my opinion, MichaelB's, a.k.a Bolton, posts are traps for more clicks ... money for the Star. MichaelB has access to anything and everything anybody posted from the beginning. His pseudonym is an inside sleazy tactic to pull in hits ... bucks for the Star.
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.



      
    Copyright . http://DEFENDOURBORDER.US. All rights reserved.